[Previous entry: "Classic Metal - the Story of my GT500KR"] [Next entry: "Another blogger"]
02/02/2004: "What are sisters for?"
What a gal! Upset that her brother is in such trouble with all of his child-molesting issues, she bravely flops out a titty at the Superbowl to take some of the heat off him. Or was it jealousy? Was she just mad that Michael's getting all the limelight, and wanted her share???
Still, whatever the reason, you've got to admit that it takes balls (or some such) to expose yourself, in Texas, during the biggest sporting event in the US. Live. Well, it also takes a lot of brains - there aren't a lot of opportunities that you can go live to several hundred million people.
The crys are already going out for her to be arrested for exposure. Don't forget that this is the same law that Jim Morrison broke many years ago, and the law hasn't actually changed since then. The crys are also going out for Justin Timberlake to be arrested for assault, believe it or not. Of course, the official line is that it was a "wardrobe malfunction". Take a look at this picture. You can clearly see the inside of the piece that Justin pulled off. There is a piece of red frill at the top, and that is it - no bra piece, no nothing. Any claims that this was not 100% planned, at least by Janet Jackson, is bull. Hmmm, another surprise is that her new single hit the radio today...
So, why is this blogworthy? Simply to point out that although there is a huge, cover-up and conspiracy right out in the open, it _isn't_ important. But what it does do is give people a conspiracy to worry about, talk about, argue about, without any danger of actually revealing anything important. A brilliant piece of anti-cover up for ... well, something else... bwahahahahah.
Replies: 2 Comments
On Monday, February 2nd, at 22:18 PST, susannah said:
Exposure, coverup, over exposure, indecent exposure? blah blah blah. Let's not forget that most CBS shows show more tit and sexuality (daytime soaps, survivor, awards shows, reality TV)than a two second show of Janet Jacksons boob, which we have all seen on magazines and album covers. The women in the stands (fans) were showing nearly as much cleavage and had far less experience with public nudity I imagine...or maybe not..I could retract that..it was a sporting event in texas...Still I will correct you on one thing...Janet doesn't think twice about showing her boobs...She's in the entertainment business. She's ready for her close up...
I find it most offensive ( though not surprising)that people WERE complaining about it. And why in gods name was the superbowl in Texas ( gee I wonder, dubbya.)
conspiracy theories....on three, two ..one...
On Wednesday, February 4th, at 14:37 PST, susannah said:
FYI....from yahoo news...
Lycos said Wednesday that Jackson sent even more Netizens to the Web than both the 9/11 terror attacks and Paris Hilton.
"On Monday, Janet Jackson and the halftime show received 60 times as many searches as the Paris Hilton sex tape and 80 times as many searches as Britney Spears (news)," Lycos 50's Aaron Schatz said in a statement.
The Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S., meanwhile, has had it up to here with Janet Jackson this, Janet Jackson that. It wants to talk--or, more accurately, blast--Kid Rock.
"While MTV and CBS have issued apologies for the Janet Jackson incident, they have yet to address Kid Rock's disgusting use of an American flag as a costume prop," VFW commander-in-chief Edward S. Banas Sr., said in a statement Tuesday.
Kid Rock was part of the MTV halftime show, along with Jackson, Timberlake, P. Diddy and Nelly. Although he did not expose a breast, he did wear an American flag pancho, which was later offered up to the crowd.
Banas said his membership found "Kid Rock's stunt...in poor taste and extremely disrespectful."
The FCC (news - web sites) previously has said the entire halftime show, not just the part featuring Jackson's assets, will come under its scrutiny.
